Imagine... you're trying a premises case next week. Your client told first responders and the ER she "just lost consciousness and fell". There's no video. The IME burns you on the inconsistency of those statements vs. later, self-serving ones. There's no offer. Your mission, if you choose to accept it, is to pick a jury and (somehow) put on a righteous case. Because Przemek had previously trained with David, he felt confident he could do just that and win - not just despite these facts - but because of them. We'll use Przemek's case and others as a foil for David to give us insights on mindset, voir dire, reframing , and cross-examination. No audio or visual recording.